Main Menu

Class Reptilia
Order Squamata
Suborder Serpentes
Family Dipsadidae

rule

Diadophis punctatus—Ringneck Snake // Heterodon nasicus—Western Hognosed Snake // Hypsiglena—Night Snakes // Hypsiglena chlorophaea—Desert Night Snake // Hypsiglena jani—Chihuahuan Night Snake // Hypsiglena "torquata"—Night Snake

Dipsadidae—Slender and Robust Rear-Fanged Snakes

In the past, the members of this family have usually been placed in the Colubridae, with Heterodon more recently placed in the Xenodontidae and, as of late 2009, Dipsadidae. These small snakes have enlarged, grooved teeth toward the back of the jaw that are used to introduce venom into their prey. They are generally considered harmless to humans.

rule

Diadophis punctatus (Linnaeus 1766)—Ringneck SnakeDistribution of fossil Diadophis punctatus

Diadophis punctatus; photo by Carls S. LiebRingneck Snakes are widespread in the Southwest, but mainly limited to woodlands between 1200 and 2200 m, although dispersal along riparian corridors occurs; desertscrub is a definite barrier (Van Devender and Worthington 1977).

Fig. 1. Ringneck Snake. Carl S. Lieb photograph.

Sites.

Wisconsin: CC:5:5 (Mead et al. 2003).

Mid Wisconsin: Pendejo Cave (Harris 2003).

Late Wisconsin: Upper Sloth Cave (Logan and Black 1979).

Late Wisconsin/Holocene: Fowlkes Cave (Parmley 1990: cf.); Howell's Ridge Cave (Van Devender and Worthington 1977).

Literature. Harris 2003; Logan and Black 1979; Mead et al. 2003; Parmley 1990; Van Devender and Worthington 1977.

rule

Heterodon nasicus Baird & Girard 1852—Western Hog-nosed SnakeDistribution of fossil Heterodon nasicus

Heterodon nasicus, photo by Carls S. LiebAll records are from areas within the present range of the Western Hognose Snake. Van Devender and Worthington (1977) give the preferred habitat as grasslands with less common occurrence in desertscrub.

Sites.

Late Wisconsin: Blackwater Draw Fauna (Slaughter 1975: cf.); TT II (UTEP).

Late Wisconsin/Holocene: Howell's Ridge Cave (Van Devender and Worthington 1977).

Literature. Slaughter 1975; Van Devender and Worthington 1977.

rule

Hypsiglena Cope 1860—Night Snakes

Most records of Hypsiglena in our region were reported as H. torquata. However, Mulcahy (2008) recognized a number of species among populations previously recognized as H. torquata. At least three of these species occur now within our region. The Pleistocene records have been parceled out according to the modern distribution (with the exception of those from southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico—see below). This is deemed by me to be the lesser of two evils (the other evil is just recognizing all to the generic level only).

rule

Hypsiglena chlorophaea Cope 1860—Desert Night SnakeRegional distribution of Pleistocene Hypsiglena chlorphaea

Roughly, the western two-thirds and northern border of Arizona are within the range of H. chlorophaea, and identifications in the literature of H. torquata are assigned to that species solely on the basis of geography.

Sites.

Late Wisconsin: New Water Mountains (Van Devender and Mead 1978); Picacho Peak (Van Devender et al. 1991; Vulture Canyon (Van Devender et al. 1977a); Vulture Cave (Mead and Phillips 1981); Wolcott Peak (Van Devender and Mead 1978).

Literature. Mead and Phillips 1981; Van Devender and Mead 1978; Van Devender et al. 1977a; Van Devender et al. 1991.

rule

Hypsiglena jani (Dugès 1865)—Chihuahuan Night SnakeRegional distribution of Pleistocene Hypsiglena jani

Sites.

Late Wisconsin/Holocene: Fowlkes Cave (Parmley 1990).

Literature. Parmley 1990.

rule

Hypsiglena "torquata" (Günther 1860)—Night SnakeDistribution of fossil Hypsiglena 'torquata'

Hypsiglena torquata; photo by Carls S. Lieb

The night snakes pose a problem in identification of fossil material in southeastern Arizona, southwestern New Mexico, and vicinity. Mulcahy (2008) divided the species Hypsiglena torquata into a number of species, with three (H. chlorophaea, H. jani, and an unnamed species [Cochise clade]) in the region mentioned. Hypsiglena torquata itself was limited to Mexico. The records given here were identified as H. torquata before the splitting into separate species. Not only are there no known osteological features separating the species, but relatively small shifts in geographic ranges could put any of the three at a given fossil site. Thus I have retained the name H. torquata, but with the specific epithet in quotes.

Fig. 1. Hypsiglena torquata. Photograph courtesy of Carl S Lieb.

Van Devender and Worthington (1977) indicated that H. torquata was probably most common in desertscrub but also occupies elevationally higher habitats into pine forest.

Sites.

Late Wisconsin/Holocene: Deadman Cave (Mead et al. 1984); Howell's Ridge Cave (Van Devender and Worthington 1977).

Literature. Mead et al. 1984; Mulcahy 2008; Parmley 1990; Van Devender and Worthington 1977.

rule

Last Update: 5 Mar 2013