Skip to main content
UTEP IDRB

PLANNING PROCESS

UTEP STRATEGIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE

In January 2020, UTEP started a strategic planning process that began with envisioning alternative futures, each rooted in elements of UTEP’s history and proven successes.

With these futures as a foundation for creative exploration, a 22-member advisory committee comprised of faculty and staff representatives from across the University worked to identify current and possible initiatives that could be scaled to help the University more fully achieve its mission.

The team analyzed over 73 initiatives for impact and ability to scale – and then categorized them within four key mission areas: teaching and learning, research, community impact and leadership.

Through discussion and analysis of initiatives, the committee then identified unique strengths that not only define who we are as an institution, but that also give us clear advantages for where we want to be in 10 years: our place, our people, our culture of care and our engagement with partners.

With these strengths and advantages guiding the process, a core team from the advisory committee worked to bridge recommendations from the larger group with input from campus leadership and from faculty and staff colleagues throughout the campus community.

Draft after draft of strategic advantages, goals and initiatives, pathways and possibilities began to emerge, each more fully reaffirming the importance of our mission and our clear purpose in higher education. Metrics quickly followed, providing us with a compass and a means for assessing how well we are accomplishing our goals. Drafts were shared formally and informally and, as ideas were refined with college, school, and research leaders, department heads and Cabinet members, the value of the plan was deepened by the process of collective planning.

With this plan in place, the real work of the campus community will begin. And, while we know that there will be bumps along the way, we believe our vision is based on a solid foundation of who we are and who we can become.

Our strategic plan must look to the future; it must also build upon the strong foundation of who we are. ”

– UTEP President Heather Wilson’s charge to the committee, January 2020

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PLANNING PROCESS

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

• 22 members: Cross-campus selection representing all colleges

• Core team, writing team, communications team

FRAMEWORK

• Seven alternative futures set the stage to identify inherent strengths

• Four unique strategic advantages

• Four clear goals with high-leverage initiatives to move us toward goals

PARTICIPATORY AND INCLUSIVE

• Virtual conversations with faculty and staff

• Virtual conversations with deans

• Provost conversations with deans

• Presentations to chairs, student government and other campus constituencies

PLANNING TIMELINE

SPRING 2020

Project Initiation and Strategic Thinking

Advisory Committee began meeting in January 2020

Identified initiatives for each of the seven alternative futures

EARLY SUMMER 2020

Advisory Committee Reset

Committee assessed impact of COVID-19 on operations and planning

Core team prepared for summer virtual sessions

LATE SUMMER 2020

Virtual Conversations

Conducted virtual conversations with 121 faculty/staff and all deans

Discussed impact of pandemic on alternative futures and long-term planning

FALL 2020 – SPRING 2021

Cross-Referenced Initiatives into Four Domains

Distilled goals and initiatives within each of the four domains with Advisory Committee, Deans, Cabinet