RCRA 101 — Export Controls and Your Research
Best for: Faculty engaged in international, restricted, or technology-focused research involving travel, equipment, software, data, or technical information.
You'll leave with: A practical understanding of potential export-control triggers and when to seek institutional review.
Bring: A brief description of relevant travel, collaboration, technology, data, equipment, software, or materials.
RCRA 102 — Safeguarding Your Research
Best for: Faculty conducting sponsored research, working internationally, hosting visitors, or traveling abroad for research.
You'll leave with: Greater clarity about research-security expectations, disclosures, foreign affiliations, screening, and available support.
Bring: Questions about affiliations, collaborations, travel, disclosures, or sponsor requirements.
RCRA 103 — Hosting Visiting Scholars with Researchers
Best for: Faculty, principal investigators, laboratory directors, and center leaders planning to host a visitor.
You'll leave with: A framework for screening, access, host responsibilities, and required steps before, during, and after a visit.
Bring: A description of a current or planned visitor.
RCRA 104 — Managing International Collaborations
Best for: Faculty developing or maintaining relationships with international universities, governments, laboratories, companies, or scholars.
You'll leave with: A clearer view of disclosure, sponsor, access, affiliation, and research-security considerations.
Bring: A description of an international collaborator or proposed partnership.
RCRA 105 — Preparing for International Research Travel
Best for: Faculty traveling internationally for research, fieldwork, conferences, collaborations, consulting, or other University activities.
You'll leave with: A practical travel checklist covering approvals, cybersecurity, devices, data, equipment, and destination-specific requirements.
Bring: Details of planned travel, if available.
RCRA 106 — Working with Controlled Unclassified Information
Best for: Faculty pursuing or conducting federally sponsored research, particularly with the U.S. Department of Defense or U.S. Department of Energy.
You'll leave with: The ability to recognize CUI language, understand safeguarding expectations, and engage UTEP before submission.
Bring: A solicitation, award document, or project description, if available.
RCRA 107 — Serving on a Research Compliance Committee Service
Best for: Faculty interested in University service, research oversight, or deeper knowledge of compliance review.
You'll leave with: A clearer understanding of IACUC, IRB, and IBC roles, commitments, training, and professional value.
Bring: Questions about service and areas of compliance interest.
RCRA 201 — Prepare a Stronger IACUC Protocol
Best for: Faculty preparing animal-use submissions or strengthening their protocol-development process.
You'll leave with: A clearer, more complete submission with fewer avoidable omissions and inconsistencies.
Bring: A draft protocol, project summary, or animal-study concept.
RCRA 202 — Prepare a Stronger IBC Protocol
Best for: Faculty conducting research involving biological agents, recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids, or related biosafety oversight.
You'll leave with: A more complete submission informed by required training, documents, and common review issues.
Bring: A project summary involving biological materials or biosafety oversight.
RCRA 203 — Prepare a Stronger IRB Protocol
Best for: Faculty planning human-subject research or seeking to improve future submissions.
You'll leave with: A clearer protocol that describes procedures and participant protections consistently and completely.
Bring: A study concept, draft protocol, or research plan.
RCRA 204 — Responding to eProtocol Review Comments
Best for: Faculty with an active IACUC, IBC, or IRB submission, including those supervising protocol revisions.
You'll leave with: A complete point-by-point response and a consistent plan for revising related sections and documents.
Bring: Reviewer comments or an active protocol requiring revision.
RCRA 301 — Choosing the Right IRB Review Path
Best for: Faculty planning human-subject research or advising students and research teams on study design.
You'll leave with: A clearer understanding of exempt, expedited, and full-board pathways and the factors that shape an IRB determination.
Bring: A brief description of a proposed human-subject study.
RCRA 302 — Reporting Events and Changes to the IRB
Best for: Faculty conducting approved human-subject research or supervising staff and students.
You'll leave with: Clarity about reportable events, deviations, changes, potential noncompliance, and when prior approval is required.
Bring: Questions about an approved study or planned change.
RCRA 303 — Plan Consent and Assent for Human-Subject Research
Best for: Faculty designing studies involving adults, minors, impaired decision-making, deception, or incomplete disclosure.
You'll leave with: A stronger consent process that addresses permission, assent, representatives, waivers, and documentation.
Bring: A consent form, study description, or recruitment plan.
RCRA 304 — Prepare for IRB Continuing Review
Best for: Faculty responsible for studies that require continuing IRB oversight.
You'll leave with: A timely, complete continuing-review submission and a clearer distinction from other post-approval actions.
Bring: Information about an active study approaching continuing review.
RCRA 401 — Understanding LARC Notifications
Best for: Faculty and research teams conducting animal research or using LARC services.
You'll leave with: Greater confidence interpreting notifications, determining required action, and responding on time.
Bring: Examples of notifications, if available.
RCRA 402 — Purchasing Biological Agents
Best for: Faculty, laboratory directors, and personnel who purchase or work with biological agents.
You'll leave with: A clear view of required approvals, documentation, purchasing steps, and potential delay points.
Bring: Information about a planned purchase.
RCRA 403 — Prepare for a PAVE Review
Best for: Faculty responsible for approved research activities subject to post-approval verification.
You'll leave with: A practical understanding of the review, relevant records and practices, follow-up, and educational support.
Bring: Questions about approved activities or documentation.